Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Analysis: Brodeur scapegoat for Canada's woes

      
  1. #1
    Genofan#1's Avatar
    Status : Genofan#1 is offline
    Rank : Minor Leaguer
    Join Date : Nov 18, 2009
    Posts : 704
    Threads : 210
    Last Online : Dec-11-2010 @ 06:06 PM

    Default Analysis: Brodeur scapegoat for Canada's woes

    Crosby's line shifting, defensive lapses, tightness more to blame
    Tuesday, February 23, 2010
    By Dejan Kovacevic, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette
    Ryan Remiorz/Associated PressCanada goaltender Martin Brodeur gave up four goals in the 5-3 loss to the U.S. Sunday.VANCOUVER, British Columbia -- You know that friend you occasionally drag with you to Mellon Arena, the one who really does not know hockey all that well?

    This is the one who says, anytime the Penguins lose, "It's the goalie's fault."

    Well, welcome to Canada, cradle of the game, where most everyone seems to have applied that overly simplistic analysis to what ails their national team at these Olympics.

    Martin Brodeur, winningest goaltender in NHL history: It's your fault.

    Never mind that the gold-medal favorite Canada has been exposed with all kinds of other issues in ending the preliminary round with a sixth seed and having to face Germany in a qualification-round game today. And never mind that, if Brodeur's performance is dissected, he really has not performed that badly. No, the push since the final horn of the 5-3 loss Sunday night to the United States has been to replace Brodeur with Roberto Luongo.


    PG BLOGS
    Dejan Kovacevic -- live in Vancouver
    Insights from veteran Olympics reporter Tony ChamberlainAnd, sure enough, coach Mike Babcock informed his goaltenders after Canada's practice Monday night that Luongo will start against Germany. Brodeur will be the backup, and Marc-Andre Fleury will continue not to dress.

    It just might be that Luongo, buoyed by playing in front of the fans of the Vancouver Canucks, will be the savior. But maybe not, in light of at least three other pressing matters for Canada:

    1. Find Crosby a Kunitz
    Sidney Crosby was Canada's best forward through two games but mostly struggled in the loss to the United States despite his late goal: He generated little offense, posted a minus-3 and inadvertently deflected one of the Americans' goals past Brodeur.

    His right winger, Rick Nash, has been quite good, but Babcock surprisingly decided at practice Monday to take Nash off that line. The new unit: Crosby, Jarome Iginla and Eric Staal. This after Babcock already tried three other left wingers with Crosby and Nash: Patrice Bergeron, Iginla, Bergeron again, then Mike Richards.

    Maybe general manager Steve Yzerman should have weighed the importance of Canada adding a player in the mold of Chris Kunitz, odd as that might sound. Even though Kunitz does not score much -- and he very seldom did during the Penguins' championship run -- he takes care of other matters for Crosby, from defense to grinding to simply sending the puck his way.

    Either that, or the Canadians should take a cue from the Russians and load up one ultra-line.

    2. Play better D
    Chris Pronger might have been the only Canadian player to bring it up Sunday: Their much vaunted defense was awful.

    Despite their 45-22 edge in shots and domination in territorial play, one curious trend Sunday was that, on those few times the U.S. team would venture into Canada's zone, there almost always was a quality scoring chance.

    "We had a lot of lapses," Pronger said. "And that's unacceptable."

    That also was not Brodeur's fault.

    3. Pressure? Please
    The word "pressure" is spoken so often in Canada as it relates to the nation's athletes, it is a wonder the participants' heads do not burst during the Olympic opening ceremonies. Still, rather than dismiss this element or downplay it, Babcock has expressed angst over it. So have some of his players.

    At the other end of that spectrum, the U.S. kids appear to be having a blast, perhaps because they realize there are more serious problems facing society than 12 skaters chasing a small slice of vulcanized rubber.

    This was what American forward Patrick Kane had to say Sunday about being the tournament's top seed now: "This is a lifetime opportunity for a lot of us, and we're going to have fun with it."

    As for Brodeur ...

    In his two games, he has given up six goals on 45 shots for a highly unattractive save percentage of .867. There have been superb saves in there, including breakaway stops Sunday on the Americans' Dustin Brown and Bobby Ryan. But, as Tom Barrasso once pointedly said, "It's not the saves you make. It's the goals you give up."

    OK, these are the goals Brodeur has allowed: Against Switzerland, there was a pinpoint top-shelf slap shot and another goal that ricocheted in off the skate of Canada teammate Patrick Marleau. Brodeur also bailed out the Canadians in the shootout by stopping all four attempts. Against the United States, two goals were largely his fault, which is two too many in a big game. But another came on a deflection by Jamie Langenbrunner, the other deflected by teammate Crosby.

    Here is a fact: Canada's only regulation victory at these Olympics came against a Norway team with zero NHL players, and its shootout victory vs. Switzerland came against a roster with two NHL players.

    No, Brodeur has not been the fortress one is used to seeing with the New Jersey Devils. But this is all his fault with two goals in two games that could be pinned on him?


    Dejan Kovacevic:


    Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/10054...#ixzz0gNNbutbX

  2. #2
    Kipper's Avatar
    Status : Kipper is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 8, 2009
    Posts : 67,323
    Threads : 1817
    Last Online : Apr-25-2017 @ 08:36 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Analysis: Brodeur scapegoat for Canada's woes

    Pretty good article, Geno.

    I'll throw this out there to

    This isn't the usual New Jersey Devils styled defense out there or Devils defensive minded type of scheme out there. It's been rumored and said for years that a nice chunk of Brodeur's success (not all of it mind you) has been attributed to the protection that the Devils defensive style has brought. Brodeur is good and he took advantage of it and it's possible that a "good" goalie became "great" because of the style and scheme he played with.

    An .867 save percentage is awful anyway you slice it. the Canadians had control of the puck and possession for most of that game and peppered shot amongst shot on Ryan Miller who was making great save after great save.... Marty Brodeur? Wasn't making great saves, wasn't being peppered with shots, wasn't being ran like Miller was... Personally I'd put Luongo in who is a more athletically gifted goalie and NEVER put a ****ty player like mike Richards on the top line. Iginla - Crosby - Nash looked BAD ***. They scored, Ignila had a hat trick, they were dominating and Babcock split that line for the USA game for no good reason

  3. #3
    The Sodfather's Avatar
    Status : The Sodfather is offline
    Rank : Major Leaguer
    Join Date : Dec 10, 2009
    Posts : 1,431
    Threads : 29
    Last Online : Apr-26-2012 @ 03:04 PM

    Default Re: Analysis: Brodeur scapegoat for Canada's woes

    Why he took Iginla off Sid's line is beyond me. Glad he did though.

  4. #4
    (419)BlackNGold's Avatar
    Status : (419)BlackNGold is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 25, 2009
    Location : NW Ohio
    Posts : 18,418
    Threads : 206
    Last Online : Jul-16-2017 @ 01:31 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Analysis: Brodeur scapegoat for Canada's woes

    I think Canada should bench Brodeur, just like the 1980 Soviets benched Tretiak in the game vs the USA! No one will ever second guess the Canadians if they make that move!

    USSR Coach Viktor Tikhonov said that benching Tretiak was the biggest coaching mistake he made in his entire storied, coaching career. While Tretiak was not great in that game.... Myshkin was worse!

    You know what you've got with Brodeur. Who knows about Luongo.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •