Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?

  1. #1
    Skeeter's Avatar
    Status : Skeeter is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 12, 2009
    Location : Sharon, PA
    Posts : 5,322
    Threads : 1632
    Last Online : May-17-2015 @ 02:45 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?

    Wild About Wallace
    by Phil Dzikiy on Aug 30, 2010 7:37 PM EDT

    Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?

    At first, the notion seems preposterous. Wallace had an excellent rookie season, especially when considering the tendency of rookie WRs to struggle in the NFL. Wallace had six touchdowns. He was an immediate deep threat, averaging an outstanding 19.4 yards per catch (tops in the league for qualifying WRs). He scored high in Football Outsiders metrics his DVOA (a stat which measures value per play) was fourth among qualifying WRs. He finished in the top 50 in total receiving yardage. He even ran the ball five times for 48 yards.

    Now he's stepping into the starting spot vacated by Santonio Holmes, rising up fantasy draft boards and looking like a breakout star.

    But somehow, Steeler fans don't seem adequately excited enough about the second season of Wallace. Perhaps there are simply too many other players in the spotlight, due to the Roethlisberger suspension, the return of Polamalu and Aaron Smith on defense, the team's reunion with Randle El, McFadden, Leftwich and Foote, the continued emergence of Mendenhall, and yes, Isaac Redman.

    Well, it's time to get psyched for Mike.

    Impressive rookie season aside, I think many Steeler fans think of Wallace as a deep threat, and perhaps, little else. That's how we know Wallace at this point. A guy who can go long, get behind the last guy, and finish the play. And there's certainly nothing wrong with that. I don't get the sense Steeler fans are concerned about Wallace replacing Holmes, but it seems like the consensus is "the Steelers will plug him in and they'll be just fine." Perhaps these expectations are too low. Maybe the Steelers will be more than fine.

    Maybe Wallace is better than Holmes. Maybe the Holmes trade didn't mean the Steelers were settling on the field maybe they wanted to move a superior WR into a starting role, and jettisoning Holmes was an easy way to do that. Yes, Holmes' off-field transgressions (and the transgressions of other Steelers) were almost certainly the main reasons for his exit, but there may be other factors in play.

    Staying within the realm of Pittsburgh sports, it's possible the Wallace-for-Holmes move will end up like the Nate McLouth trade that cleared the way for McCutchen to start for the Pirates. After his suspension ends, I don't think Holmes will struggle like McLouth has this season (Nate's in the minors), but the result could be the same for Pittsburgh fans: The initial reactions after the trade "that's all we got?" fade away after the new player eclipses the former starter.

    Really, can you remember the Steelers having a WR more explosive than Wallace? I'm not one to get too worked up about 40 times and raw speed, but Wallace has already proven he can put that speed to good use. He's not Darrius Heyward-Bey.

    The concern is that many speedster and deep threat WRs never develop into complete receivers. Which is why I was glad to read this in Peter King's Steeler Camp Postcard for

    "Mike Wallace, the new starter alongside Ward, worked all offseason on being fast in and out of his cuts, and I watched him do some extra work against corners after practice. He was smoking."

    Wallace already has the speed and the talent. Now word comes through that he's really working hard on his cuts, which means he's working on his routes. Route running is probably the most underrated attribute among NFL WRs running a great route isn't sexy, but it's very, very important. Practice, polish and attention to detail will turn Wallace from a dangerous receiver into a great receiver. There's a possibility that it's already happening. And who better to help him learn these things than Hines Ward?

    On top of all this, Wallace rocks a mohawk. Respect.

    (And I can't believe I got through this whole column without making a "60 Minutes" joke.)

    Phil Dzikiy is a journalist, blogger and Steeler fan, among many other things. Visit him online at or follow him on Twitter @phildzikiy, if you're into that sort of thing

  2. #2
    Palmetto Steel's Avatar
    Status : Palmetto Steel is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 9, 2009
    Posts : 23,379
    Threads : 3263
    Last Online : Nov-30-2015 @ 06:36 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?

    "Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?"

    ... Tough to tell whether he is either under or over hyped at this point of the preseason... Time will tell as this year progresses... I do think he has the ability and opportunity to do great things with this team, though... But he's still a bit of a "young buck", so I expect some more growing pains as he evolves.
    "You only have one life, and you will not get out alive. Make the most of your time and have no regrets." - Me.

  3. #3
    Beezy's Avatar
    Status : Beezy is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Pig Hill
    Posts : 10,074
    Threads : 82
    Last Online : Nov-10-2016 @ 07:09 AM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Is it possible that Mike Wallace is under-hyped coming into this season?

    Well Wallace has been the big target so far in pre-season but Ward and ARE haven't played a ton. If other teams underhype him then I am certain he will have another big year. Who knows?

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts