Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ben...Receivers...O-line

      
  1. #1
    fezziwig's Avatar
    Status : fezziwig is offline
    Rank : All-Star
    Join Date : Nov 3, 2009
    Posts : 2,236
    Threads : 60
    Last Online : May-22-2017 @ 08:56 AM

    Default Ben...Receivers...O-line

    Everyone talks about, " does Ben hold onto the ball too long or does the o-line stink or both or what have you ? "
    My novice question is, are our receivers not doing well enough or getting the seperation that causes Ben the need to hold onto the ball ? I know they had big stats in the passing game last season but without Ben being crazy legs, a lot of those plays wouldn't have been.

  2. #2
    Les's Avatar
    Status : Les is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 10, 2009
    Location : Secane,Pa.
    Posts : 10,207
    Threads : 48
    Last Online : Jul-04-2017 @ 07:08 AM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ben...Receivers...O-line

    I say its a little of all three.

  3. #3
    War Machine's Avatar
    Status : War Machine is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Avalon, PA
    Posts : 6,623
    Threads : 88
    Last Online : Aug-10-2016 @ 02:02 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Ben...Receivers...O-line

    I think Ben has needed a little extra time to offload the ball and Hartwig's time here collapsed the line in the middle with an almost undignified alacrity.

    The rest is a combination of Ben's judgement (when to run or not) and the receivers' ability to get to the gap.

    There's the odd Int in there, but he's not up to Lord Favre's 3-per-game quotient yet.
    'I want rustlers, cut throats, murderers, bounty hunters, desperados, mugs, pugs, thugs, nitwits, halfwits, dimwits, vipers, snipers, con men, Indian agents, Mexican bandits, muggers, buggerers, bushwhackers, hornswogglers, horse thieves, bull dykes, train robbers, bank robbers, ***-kickers, ****-kickers and Methodists.'

  4. #4
    fezziwig's Avatar
    Status : fezziwig is offline
    Rank : All-Star
    Join Date : Nov 3, 2009
    Posts : 2,236
    Threads : 60
    Last Online : May-22-2017 @ 08:56 AM

    Default Re: Ben...Receivers...O-line

    I forgot about Ben is finally going to play behind a center that is better than his last two centers. I know Ben got to play behind Hartings but Hartings was at the end of his time. He is also going to have a better guard with Legursky in there. I wonder how long it will take for Ben to develope into an almost new o-line with three of them never playing for Ben before ?
    Exciting stuff to watch.

  5. #5
    hawaiiansteeler's Avatar
    Status : hawaiiansteeler is offline
    Rank : Superstar
    Join Date : Apr 7, 2010
    Posts : 2,614
    Threads : 440
    Last Online : Nov-04-2012 @ 09:47 PM

    Default Re: Ben...Receivers...O-line

    Oct 15, 2010

    Why the Steelers receivers need Ben Roethlisberger back so badly





    PITTSBURGH -- Beyond personal connections, the pass-catching numbers of the Pittsburgh Steelers receivers show why they are excited about the return of quarterback Ben Roethlisberger.

    Coming off a four-game suspension, Roethlisberger starts here Sunday against the Cleveland Browns. Though the Steelers went 3-1 without him, they rank last in the NFL in passing after playing with Charlie Batch and Dennis Dixon at quarterback.

    The statistics amassed so far by Steelers receivers reflect that bottom-ranked status.

    A quarter of the way through the season, wide receiver Hines Ward leads the team with 12 catches for 165 yards. Multiply those 12 catches by four and it projects to 48 in a season. Last season, Ward had 95 grabs for 1,167 yards and six TDs.

    Tight end Heath Miller has 10 catches for 100 yards and no touchdowns. That would project to 40 catches in a season. Last season, Miller had 76 receptions for 789 yards and six touchdowns.

    A year ago as a rookie wide receiver, Mike Wallace had 39 catches for 756 yards and six touchdowns.

    So far this season, he has nine catches for 211 yards and two TDs. Who knows what those numbers might have been had Roethlisberger been playing instead of Dixon and Batch?

    "No disrespect to the other guys. They did a phenomenal job," says Ward. "But we are a better ball club when (Roethlisberger's) in the game. So it's great to have there."

    Ward says Roethlisberger had a "great training camp." Thanks to a bye, the quarterback has had two weeks to prepare for Cleveland since coming off the suspension.

    "I'm excited to get out there with him and get things going. We miss him," says Ward.

    "We left a lot of plays out there in the first four games that we could have capitalized (on). …He definitely adds that dimension where he's going to be sharp with all his reads. But when protection does break down, unlike the other quarterbacks, he's able to make big plays outside the pocket. So he brings an added dimension to our offense."

    Now all the Pittsburgh receivers have some catching -- and catching up -- to do.

    Wallace showed up this week minus his Mohawk haircut.

    Roethlisberger says that before this season, he had Wallace had a "little deal" that he would get rid of the Mohawk if he got 1,000 yards receiving.

    "So I was really going to push for that this year, to get him the yards," says Roethlisberger. "But he did it already, so we'll just give him 1,000 yards without it, hopefully."

    -- Gary Mihoces

    http://content.usatoday.com/communities ... so-badly/1

    _________________

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •