Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

      
  1. #1
    Skeeter's Avatar
    Status : Skeeter is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 12, 2009
    Location : Sharon, PA
    Posts : 5,322
    Threads : 1632
    Last Online : May-17-2015 @ 02:45 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Six signs parity is dead in NFL
    Kerry J. Byrne > COLD HARD FOOTBALL FACTS
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200.../10/28/parity/

    Rest in peace, parity.

    The NFL's decades-long effort to produce equality on the playing field is dead and buried. In fact, it suffered a gruesome, unwatchable demise in Week 7 of the 2009 season.

    Perhaps it's only fitting that parity's final bloody demise came just days before Halloween, in a week that produced a record six four-touchdown blowouts in the space of a few hours on Sunday.

    Parity is not only dead, it's been walking around like the undead for most of the past decade, kept alive only by lazy pigskin pundits who dusted the cobwebs off the catch-phrase every time they needed to explain away every close game or surprising playoff run.

    But instead of parity, what the NFL has these days is something much more frightening: the NFL has a crisis of competition.

    Week after week this year, the haunting disparity between the league's haves and have-nots threatens to produce results we typically see from the University of Florida's non-conference schedule. The NFL, like college football, is now a two-tiered league in which the powerful elite can be reasonably counted upon to not only win on Sunday, but to humiliate the league's second-class citizens.

    Here are six signs that parity is dead:

    1. The frightening pace of blowouts
    Week 7 of the 2009 season offered more televised beatings than the 1968 Democratic National Convention. Six of the 13 games last week games were uncompetitive blowouts -- each decided by 28 points or more. If that rash of routs seemed unusual, there's a good reason: it was.

    Pro football had produced six four-touchdown blowouts just once before in its history: back in Week 14 of the 1970 season, the very first year of the AFL-NFL merger.

    The average margin of victory in Week 7 was 20.3 PPG, the second highest weekly margin of victory since the merger, trailing only that final week of 1970 (23.5 PPG), according to ColdHardFootballFacts.com contributor Mark Wald, who tracks blowouts throughout history.

    A string of one-sided affairs might have been expected back in 1970.

    First, it was the last week of a 14-game season and some teams had already packed it in for the year. Second, despite victories by the AFL in Super Bowls III and IV, the old NFL (now the NFC) absolutely dominated the first year of the merger. NFC teams went 27-12-1 against AFC teams that year, the most lopsided interconference record since the merger.

    We shouldn't expect those kinds of blowouts in these days of league-wide efforts to level the playing field. But we're seeing them.

    The worst part for the NFL is that fans could see most of last Sunday's blowouts coming: Green Bay over one-win Cleveland (31-3), New England over winless Tampa (35-7), Indianapolis over winless St. Louis (42-6) and San Diego over one-win Kansas City (37-7) were all as predictable as the tides.

    And, remember, these blowouts came just a week after perennial powerhouse New England handed Tennessee a 59-0 beating -- the league's most one-sided game in 33 years. It could have been worse: the Patriots did not score a single point in the fourth quarter, or they might have matched the league's record 73-0 victory set back in 1940, when the Bears beat the Redskins in the NFL title game.

    2. Last-second thrills and chills are hard to find
    Year after year, week after week, one NFL game after another came down to a last-second play that determined the outcome. It made for great theater in a sport that thrives on televised drama. That drama is slowly disappearing.

    Here in 2009, 84 of 103 games (81.6 percent) have been decided by more than a field goal. That's the most in nearly a quarter century (since 1985) and the third most since the AFL-NFL merger. The trend began last year when 206 of 254 games (80.5 percent) were decided by more than a field goal -- also among the most since the merger.

    Double-digit blowouts, meanwhile, have become the rule here in 2009, not the exception: 56 of 103 games (54.4 percent) have been decided by 10 points or more -- the most in 17 years and also among the most since the merger.

    3. The horrifying divide in the standings
    For the first time in NFL history there are three undefeated teams after Week 7 -- Indianapolis, Denver and New Orleans. And all three look virtually unbeatable, dominating opponents week after week in virtually all phases of the game.

    But at the very same time that the NFL boasts three unbeatens nearly halfway through the season, the league also fields three winless teams -- Tennessee, Tampa and St. Louis. These teams barely look competitive, getting dominated week after week in virtually all phases of the game.

    This great divide, meanwhile, comes after a pair of historic NFL seasons. In 2007, the Patriots became the first 16-0 team in league history; in 2008, the Lions became the first 0-16 team in league history.

    The Patriots also set an NFL record in 2008 with their 21st consecutive regular-season victory. The Lions, meanwhile, suffered their 19th straight defeat earlier this year -- the second longest losing streak in league history.

    Given the respective performances of the league's powerful and powerless franchises this year, it's easy to envision a scenario in which we could have both a 16-0 team and 0-16 team here in 2009.

    A league ruled by "parity" simply does not produce historically good and historically bad seasons year after year.


  2. #2
    Skeeter's Avatar
    Status : Skeeter is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 12, 2009
    Location : Sharon, PA
    Posts : 5,322
    Threads : 1632
    Last Online : May-17-2015 @ 02:45 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Parity is dead (cont.)

    4. The gruesome disparity on the scoreboard


    Derek Anderson and the Browns are having a terrible season -- and they're not alone.
    Getty Images


    The unbeaten Saints average 39.7 PPG, which puts them on pace to surpass the single-season scoring record of 38.8 PPG set by the 1950 Rams and surpass the modern record of 36.8 PPG set by the 2007 Patriots.

    The scoring pace for New Orleans is no surprise, really, in a league that has done everything in its power to open up offenses and handcuff defenses. But not every team's taking advantage of the league's beneficence.

    In fact, at the same time that teams like the Saints, Patriots, Colts and Giants seemingly score at will, some times are so poor on offense that they need to panhandle for points.

    The Saints have scored 31 touchdowns this year (26 on offense).

    The Browns have scored just six touchdowns (four on offense).

    In fact, the Browns have scored just four offensive touchdowns in their past 13 games, dating to Thanksgiving 2008. It's one of the longest streaks of offensive futility in history, and it comes at the very same time the Saints are producing one of the great streaks of offensive success in history.

    And while the Saints are on pace to become the most prolific scoring team in NFL history (39.7 PPG), the Rams have scored just 8.6 PPG here in 2009 -- a pace which would make them the lowest scoring team of the Live Ball Era (1978-present).

    5. The bloodbath on the stat sheets
    The gridiron Grand Canyon that divides the league's winners and losers is also evident on the stat sheet. In fact, we haven't seen these kinds of disparities in statistical performances since the early days of the AFL.

    Peyton Manning, for example, once again leads the league in passer rating (114.5), a mark which could go down as one of the highest ever (he holds the record with a 121.1 passer rating in 2004).

    Cleveland quarterback Derek Anderson, meanwhile, has posted an abysmal passer rating of 40.6. He's on pace to become the lowest-rated qualifying passer (14 attempts per game) since Ryan Leaf in 1998 (39.0). Oakland's JaMarcus Russell is not much better (47.2).

    Neither Anderson nor Russell has completed even 50 percent of their passes this year. Manning, meanwhile, has completed 72.6 percent of his passes, a rate which would easily smash the existing NFL record.

    It's like the NFL is offering two completely different sports this year: on one end, there's the highly productive Space Age passing game that defenses are hopeless to stop; on the other end, there's a Neanderthalic, Stone Age passing game with numbers more like those we saw in the 1930s. (In fact, Chicago's Bronko Nagurski, posted a 67.8 passer rating in 1932, his third year in the league; Oakland's Russell has posted a 47.2 passer rating here in 2009, his third year in the league.)

    New England quarterback Tom Brady this year matched an NFL record with five TD tosses in a single quarter, in his team's 59-0 win over the Titans. A full quarter of the league this year, eight teams, have thrown five or fewer TD passes all year.

    Green Bay's Aaron Rodgers, meanwhile, averages a spectacular 9.3 yards every time he throws a pass -- he could end up with one of the 10 highest averages in NFL history. Cleveland's Anderson, meanwhile, averages just 4.4 yards per pass attempt. That number is so bad that a quarter of the teams in the NFL this year average more than 4.4 YPA when they run the ball.

    6. The haunting specter of elite powers
    Advocates of NFL "parity" say any team can win in any given year. Sure, it happens from time to time. But the league's always been like that.

    The fact of the matter in today's NFL is that four teams -- all in the AFC -- have held an iron grip over the NFL for more than a decade. Denver, Indy, New England and Pittsburgh can be counted on year after year -- with the occasional exception here and there -- to stand among the very best teams in the league.

    Those four have won 11 of the past 14 AFC titles. They've won six of the past eight Super Bowls and eight of the past 12. Over the past 15 years, the AFC's Big Four have filled 19 of 30 spots in the AFC title game.

    There's a good chance you'll see the NFL's Big Four battling for the right to go to the Super Bowl once again. They're a combined 22-4 after Week 7, and if the playoffs began today, they'd hold four of the top five seeds in the AFC. There's a good chance one of the Big Four will hoist the Lombardi Trophy once again in February 2010.

    The Colts, meanwhile, are in the midst of an unprecedented string of six straight 12-win seasons and well on their way to making it seven straight -- a fact that alone should kill any notion of "parity."

    The Patriots, of course, are two years removed from the first 16-0 season in history, they won a record 34 games over two seasons earlier this decade (2003-04), they need one postseason victory to set a record for most in a decade (15) and they've set every win streak in history this decade, regular season (21), postseason (10) and combined (21). Brady, meanwhile, has won a record 78.5 percent of every game he's started (106-29) in his career. Again, all facts that should, on their face, prove that concepts such as "parity" are dead.

    Parity's postmortem
    There's no perfect explanation for the death of parity, especially in the wake of the league's open efforts to keep it alive. But it's obvious the league's efforts to legislate equality have failed.

    Here's one guess why: the NFL, with so many players and so many coaches and so much turnover and so many moving parts, is all about management. And, right now, management has never been more important.

    Humans are not equal in talent, whether they're in the front office, on the sidelines or in the huddle, and the notion that a few rules will "level the playing field" is being mocked openly on the field right now.

    What the NFL has done, actually, is create a system that ends up rewarding well managed teams and punishing poorly managed teams. The Colts, Patriots and Steelers continue to fine tune the system year after the year and win year after year. The Browns, Lions and teams like (in recent years) the Redskins make poor and sometimes desperate off-the-field decisions that make them uncompetitive on the field.

    Back in the day, before the efforts to "level the playing field," a poorly managed team could splurge for a season or two on talent and compete. Money is the great equalizer. But that weapon has been removed and now, more than ever, not less than ever, NFL teams are dependent upon smart decision-makers and good executives. The NFL has maximized, not minimized, inequality on the playing field by maximizing the importance of management.

    It adds up the NFL's crisis of competition, meaning league executives should be afraid. Be very afraid.

    Last edited by Skeeter; Nov-01-2009 at 06:22 AM.

  3. #3
    LasVegasGuy's Avatar
    Status : LasVegasGuy is offline
    Rank : Banned
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Living on the Sun, Nevada
    Posts : 2,076
    Threads : 60
    Last Online : Jan-05-2012 @ 12:19 PM

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Quote Originally Posted by WYsteel View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    Six signs parity is dead in NFL
    Kerry J. Byrne > COLD HARD FOOTBALL FACTS
    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/200.../10/28/parity/

    Rest in peace, parity.

    The NFL's decades-long effort to produce equality on the playing field is dead and buried. In fact, it suffered a gruesome, unwatchable demise in Week 7 of the 2009 season.

    Perhaps it's only fitting that parity's final bloody demise came just days before Halloween, in a week that produced a record six four-touchdown blowouts in the space of a few hours on Sunday.

    Parity is not only dead, it's been walking around like the undead for most of the past decade, kept alive only by lazy pigskin pundits who dusted the cobwebs off the catch-phrase every time they needed to explain away every close game or surprising playoff run.

    But instead of parity, what the NFL has these days is something much more frightening: the NFL has a crisis of competition.

    Week after week this year, the haunting disparity between the league's haves and have-nots threatens to produce results we typically see from the University of Florida's non-conference schedule. The NFL, like college football, is now a two-tiered league in which the powerful elite can be reasonably counted upon to not only win on Sunday, but to humiliate the league's second-class citizens.

    Here are six signs that parity is dead:

    1. The frightening pace of blowouts
    Week 7 of the 2009 season offered more televised beatings than the 1968 Democratic National Convention. Six of the 13 games last week games were uncompetitive blowouts -- each decided by 28 points or more. If that rash of routs seemed unusual, there's a good reason: it was.

    Pro football had produced six four-touchdown blowouts just once before in its history: back in Week 14 of the 1970 season, the very first year of the AFL-NFL merger.

    The average margin of victory in Week 7 was 20.3 PPG, the second highest weekly margin of victory since the merger, trailing only that final week of 1970 (23.5 PPG), according to ColdHardFootballFacts.com contributor Mark Wald, who tracks blowouts throughout history.

    A string of one-sided affairs might have been expected back in 1970.

    First, it was the last week of a 14-game season and some teams had already packed it in for the year. Second, despite victories by the AFL in Super Bowls III and IV, the old NFL (now the NFC) absolutely dominated the first year of the merger. NFC teams went 27-12-1 against AFC teams that year, the most lopsided interconference record since the merger.

    We shouldn't expect those kinds of blowouts in these days of league-wide efforts to level the playing field. But we're seeing them.

    The worst part for the NFL is that fans could see most of last Sunday's blowouts coming: Green Bay over one-win Cleveland (31-3), New England over winless Tampa (35-7), Indianapolis over winless St. Louis (42-6) and San Diego over one-win Kansas City (37-7) were all as predictable as the tides.

    And, remember, these blowouts came just a week after perennial powerhouse New England handed Tennessee a 59-0 beating -- the league's most one-sided game in 33 years. It could have been worse: the Patriots did not score a single point in the fourth quarter, or they might have matched the league's record 73-0 victory set back in 1940, when the Bears beat the Redskins in the NFL title game.

    2. Last-second thrills and chills are hard to find
    Year after year, week after week, one NFL game after another came down to a last-second play that determined the outcome. It made for great theater in a sport that thrives on televised drama. That drama is slowly disappearing.

    Here in 2009, 84 of 103 games (81.6 percent) have been decided by more than a field goal. That's the most in nearly a quarter century (since 1985) and the third most since the AFL-NFL merger. The trend began last year when 206 of 254 games (80.5 percent) were decided by more than a field goal -- also among the most since the merger.

    Double-digit blowouts, meanwhile, have become the rule here in 2009, not the exception: 56 of 103 games (54.4 percent) have been decided by 10 points or more -- the most in 17 years and also among the most since the merger.

    3. The horrifying divide in the standings
    For the first time in NFL history there are three undefeated teams after Week 7 -- Indianapolis, Denver and New Orleans. And all three look virtually unbeatable, dominating opponents week after week in virtually all phases of the game.

    But at the very same time that the NFL boasts three unbeatens nearly halfway through the season, the league also fields three winless teams -- Tennessee, Tampa and St. Louis. These teams barely look competitive, getting dominated week after week in virtually all phases of the game.

    This great divide, meanwhile, comes after a pair of historic NFL seasons. In 2007, the Patriots became the first 16-0 team in league history; in 2008, the Lions became the first 0-16 team in league history.

    The Patriots also set an NFL record in 2008 with their 21st consecutive regular-season victory. The Lions, meanwhile, suffered their 19th straight defeat earlier this year -- the second longest losing streak in league history.

    Given the respective performances of the league's powerful and powerless franchises this year, it's easy to envision a scenario in which we could have both a 16-0 team and 0-16 team here in 2009.

    A league ruled by "parity" simply does not produce historically good and historically bad seasons year after year.

    If someone had told Bll that was the record there isn't a doubt in my mind he would have went for it.

  4. #4
    War Machine's Avatar
    Status : War Machine is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Avalon, PA
    Posts : 6,623
    Threads : 88
    Last Online : Aug-10-2016 @ 02:02 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    I have to call a large degree of BS on the article. It proceeds from a false premise. Parity was never truly existent.

    The only parity enforced was through the draft and the salary cap. This does not allow for the fact that some teams, when allocated for example a top ten draft pick due to poor performance, blow said pick due to poor scouting or generally poor personnel decisions.

    It also doesn't account for the way that drafted players will respond to coaching staff upon commencement of their careers in the NFL.

    It's based, in part, on the psychological and intellectual make-up of players and staff and that cannot be adequately quantified and factored in to the system.

    I don't view the set-up as particularly broken. Then again, I don't support one of the teams who regularly gets their arses handed to them. In short, look to the management and personnel short comings of club X before whining on their behalf that "parity is dead".

  5. #5
    Beezy's Avatar
    Status : Beezy is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Pig Hill
    Posts : 10,074
    Threads : 82
    Last Online : Nov-10-2016 @ 07:09 AM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Quote Originally Posted by War Machine View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I have to call a large degree of BS on the article. It proceeds from a false premise. Parity was never truly existent.

    The only parity enforced was through the draft and the salary cap. This does not allow for the fact that some teams, when allocated for example a top ten draft pick due to poor performance, blow said pick due to poor scouting or generally poor personnel decisions.

    It also doesn't account for the way that drafted players will respond to coaching staff upon commencement of their careers in the NFL.

    It's based, in part, on the psychological and intellectual make-up of players and staff and that cannot be adequately quantified and factored in to the system.

    I don't view the set-up as particularly broken. Then again, I don't support one of the teams who regularly gets their arses handed to them. In short, look to the management and personnel short comings of club X before whining on their behalf that "parity is dead".
    I agree I think it is BS. The article only discusses the games that reinforces his point. The Tits got blown out this week sure but it doesn't say how they tore up the NFL last year in the regular season or how they turned around and blew out a team this week after not winning a game all season. How about the Bungles going from the laughing stock the last couple seasons to being one of the top teams this year. How about Denver? Parity is not supposed to make every team mirrors of each other it merely gives bad teams a chance at digging themselves out of it. Besides I don't remember a year in recent history that we have this many teams that our flat out bad and that is what is leading to these teams going undefeated so deep into the season.

  6. #6
    War Machine's Avatar
    Status : War Machine is offline
    Rank : Hall Of Famer
    Join Date : Oct 11, 2009
    Location : Avalon, PA
    Posts : 6,623
    Threads : 88
    Last Online : Aug-10-2016 @ 02:02 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Spot on, Beezy. "Parity" isn't a guarantee, it's an opportunity. If a franchise screws the pooch on the matter, that's their responsibility and they have to live with the consequences. Without this system, who would voluntarily go to, say, Kansas, Cleveland, Oakland or St Louis?

  7. #7
    Kipper's Avatar
    Status : Kipper is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 8, 2009
    Posts : 67,323
    Threads : 1817
    Last Online : Apr-25-2017 @ 08:36 PM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Quote Originally Posted by War Machine View Post
    This quote is hidden because you are ignoring this member. Show Quote
    I have to call a large degree of BS on the article. It proceeds from a false premise. Parity was never truly existent.

    The only parity enforced was through the draft and the salary cap. This does not allow for the fact that some teams, when allocated for example a top ten draft pick due to poor performance, blow said pick due to poor scouting or generally poor personnel decisions.

    It also doesn't account for the way that drafted players will respond to coaching staff upon commencement of their careers in the NFL.

    It's based, in part, on the psychological and intellectual make-up of players and staff and that cannot be adequately quantified and factored in to the system.

    I don't view the set-up as particularly broken. Then again, I don't support one of the teams who regularly gets their arses handed to them. In short, look to the management and personnel short comings of club X before whining on their behalf that "parity is dead".
    I agree.

    What parity means is that each team is given an fair and equal chance to be as competitive as the next team (not like Baseball). There's a salary Cap, there's a controlled draft, there's excellent revenue sharing... All of these things exist so that a team with deeper pocket owners or a large market to draw from like say Dallas for example or New England. What teams do with their decision making from there is solely up to them. Teams like the Browns are horribly run from the GM to scouts to head coaches. Everything is there for them to get a good draft pick, to spend as much as the next team, to win games, they are just incompetently run, same with other teams that have been unsuccessful.

    Tides turn on teams as well. It's not like in baseball where a handful of larger market teams are always making the playoffs. We've seen powerhouses in the NFL like the early 200's Rams fall to what they've become, the Tampa Bay Buccanears were a strong annual team having won the SB this decade and have fallen and we're also seeing a team like New Orleans slowly rebuild with the competitive advantage the NFL has given into a 7-0 team that's beaten some quality opponents this year. the annual laughingstock of the league - the Bengals have both a winning record and first place in a division. Teams like the Chiefs have acknowledged that they are clearly rebuilding are going to be bad etc...

    Teams aren't divided equally with good and bad players. That would be boring as hell, but every team is given the same fair chance to build a team like the next one.

  8. #8
    Les's Avatar
    Status : Les is offline
    Rank : Legend
    Join Date : Oct 10, 2009
    Location : Secane,Pa.
    Posts : 10,207
    Threads : 48
    Last Online : Jul-04-2017 @ 07:08 AM
    Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo Sports Logo

    Default Re: Six signs parity is dead in NFL

    Shouldn't we blame the lack of parity on weak front offices more than anything else??



    Just sayin'.

Quick Reply Quick Reply

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Members who have read this thread: 0

There are no members to list at the moment.

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •